Example of Advice to the Reviewers and Criteria
Please note that this information may vary from year to year.
MERGA acknowledges many forms of scholarly inquiry and welcomes the presentation and publication of conference papers to achieve the following goals:
- bring our community together to share ideas and progress across different lines of research enquiry within the field of mathematics education
- bring the community together to discuss and debate contentious areas in the field – local, national and international
- bring forward new ideas and hold them up for critique by our community, that is, are there contributions to new knowledge (even if a small incremental step)
- help induct new researchers into the community and assist them in appropriating the standards for publication
- provide opportunity for the development of research collaborations
- provide an opportunity for researchers to learn to write their ideas down in a limited number of pages.
Pairs of reviewers are recommended to collaborate to provide a final recommendation. The options for recommendation, to help guide the Conference Committee, are shown below.
EXCELLENT & GOOD STANDARD: Accepted for publication & presentation
ACCEPTED as a paper to be published in the proceedings and presented at this conference. Maybe some minor editing required, as per comments/feedback against the criteria.
ACCEPTABLE STANDARD: Accepted for publication & presentation subject to minor revision
ACCEPTED as a paper to be published in the proceedings, with some minor revision needed prior to publication (subject to Proceedings Editors discretion).
PRESENTATION ONLY: Accepted for presentation as a Short Communication
NOT ACCEPTED for publication, but ACCEPTED FOR PRESENTATION.
Academic Quality
Comment on the overall academic quality against the criteria (listed): e.g. focus & significance, literature, theoretical perspective (where appropriate), methodology, findings, discussion.
- Has the purpose of the manuscript been made clear?
- Is the significance of the problem that frames the research made clear via reference to scholarly work or through connection to educational policy settings?
- Does the literature review/theoretical framework inform the reader of the current state of the field aligned with the identified research problem?
- Is the methodological approach and selected data collection appropriately described, justified and applied?
- Are claims from the research supported by evidence? Are the findings trustworthy? Are the conclusions/claims justified? Is the language used in accounting for analysed phenomena appropriate?
- Does the manuscript contribute to new knowledge? If so, what new knowledge? If not, what value is added to the field by the manuscript?
Formatting, Structure & General Editing Comments
Is the manuscript coherent and consistent with the technical requirements of a MERGA conference paper (correct template and use of APA7 style, spelling and grammar are of a high standard).
Any Other Recommendations
Include suggestions for the author/s about their presentation during the conference; or related to extending the paper into a journal article.
Instructions to reviewers (please download here).